Learn More About Mass Tort Litigators
Having a team of mass tort attorneys in your legal defense force will allow you to handle the volume of cases that can arise, and to keep your costs low. They will also allow you to get compensation for your injuries in an efficient manner.
Multidistrict litigation
Using multidistrict litigation for mass tort litigators is a great way to manage a large group of cases. However, there are some key points to consider when using multidistrict litigation.
Multidistrict litigation is a procedure used to consolidate lawsuits filed in various federal courts. The main purpose is to shorten the process for processing claims. The parties can submit documents and interrogatories once instead of repeatedly. This also saves time.
The number of people who have a claim against a defendant determines whether or not a case is eligible for multidistrict litigation. For example, if a number of people are harmed by the same dangerous drug, then the case could be consolidated in a single court.
The same applies to a product liability case. In many of these cases, there are hundreds of plaintiffs. If the cases are consolidated in a single court, then the parties can file for pretrial coordination. The court can remand each case to the original court for trial if the pretrial proceedings fail. This helps avoid wasting time and money on trial.
Multiple plaintiffs with different injuries
Whether you’re a plaintiff or a defendant, a mass tort is a legal concept that helps put individual plaintiffs on an equal footing in case proceedings. It essentially enables multiple injured plaintiffs to take on a single, common defendant. In the process, each plaintiff is afforded more leeway when it comes to compensation.
A mass tort is usually a product liability lawsuit, where multiple plaintiffs are suing the same manufacturer or distributor of a harmful or defective drug or medical device. In other cases, it may be a natural disaster. These kinds of cases can have a big impact on many people.
If you are considering filing a mass tort, you might want to consult an attorney with a solid track record. They will have the resources to build a strong case on your behalf.
Mass torts are usually a good deal cheaper for the parties involved. This is because the attorneys working on each case are sharing costs. This can save money on legal fees and may help to expedite the court process.
Cost-effective means of litigation
Whether you’re an injured plaintiff or an injured defendant, mass tort litigation can be a costly and time-consuming endeavor. While it may seem like a daunting task, there are several cost-effective means of managing mass tort litigation that can help you get the best outcome possible.
Using advanced technology can allow you to effectively manage and control mass tort litigation. An electronic document management system, for example, can store and house documents. You can also utilize a secured extranet for instantaneous reporting and costs trends analysis.
While mass torts are sometimes tried independently, a centralized legal structure is often necessary to ensure a successful defense. You can determine how many departments you’ll need by assessing the scope of your case.
Typically, only a small portion of a mass tort’s claims will be brought to trial. However, mass torts can grow in scope until a limit is reached on the number of people willing to file suit.
The largest mass torts are usually handled in federal multidistrict litigation or state consolidated actions. These consolidated proceedings allow judges to resolve all cases under one roof.
The Aggregation Dilemma
During the last decade, mass torts have taken over federal courts. This trend is expected to continue. However, Congress is still puttingtering around with a new version of the Multiparty, Multiforum Jurisdiction Act. It is also possible that the case could be transferred to state courts.
Mass torts differ from other product liability cases. They are often filed by a small number of law firms and involve a large number of claims in a short period of time. This difference raises factual and legal issues. They are a particularly challenging litigation phenomenon. They present public decisionmakers with a host of legal and factual problems.
Mass torts also raise conflicts of interest. For instance, plaintiffs’ attorneys seek to maximize their settlements by increasing their stakes in large aggregated trials. They also advertise their availability to represent specific classes of claimants.
Defendants are also influenced by their own interests. They may believe that it is in their best interest to settle a questionable claim. This reduces the cost of litigation. They can also engage in nationwide conduct in states where they deem the risk of suit to be acceptable.
