5 Mistakes To Avoid In Writing RPL ACS Skill Assessment Report
Overconfidence, haste, pressure, nervous and lack of care play a huge role in the RPL ACS skill assessment application rejection. Many aspirants lightly take the delicacy and seriousness of this report. They don’t check their English grammar, creativity, writing skills, concise writing techniques and use of vivid words.
A large number of them try to prepare such a skill-requiring report within a short period of time. Unbearable pressure compels them to commit more mistakes.
it is also seen that eligible candidates face rejection while those with fewer skills have a positive result with flying colours. First of all, always keep in mind that being an expert ICT professional doesn’t make you an expert in writing, especially such a critical report. Writing in English and engineering are two completely different professions. So, being perfect in one doesn’t mean that you have an excellent of the other field.
From the situations or circumstances mentioned above, we have prepared a list of 5 common mistakes in writing an ACS RPL report. We did so after meeting many rejected candidates and conducting some deep research. So, read them with patience and undivided attention and also know how to avoid them.
5 mistakes you must avoid for a perfect Australia ACS RPL report:
- Fake or false information
An ACS skill assessment report must be free from any false or fake information. The ACS authority expects real and genuine information from their applicants for a proper evaluation. The assessment authority deals with countless applications and sees uncountable reports and relevant documents on a daily basis. So, they must be in a position to differentiate between an original and a fake one.
Therefore, keep your report with genuine facts and information to avoid rejection. Remember once rejected, you can’t apply for the same for a long time.
- not giving credit to others
To show your competency as an ICT engineer, you must prove that you are creative and innovative. You will also need to show how your ideas brought the desired result. In short, your creativity level and ideas exemplify your expertise in your field.
In your report, if you mention someone’s idea, don’t forget to mention them. Even if you use the methods they use, their diagrams and examples, it is a must for you to mention them and give them the credit they deserve. It’s a genuine and praiseworthy act for which you will be highly appreciated by the authority.
If you forget to do so, you will sound dishonest and fake, which will sow the seeds of your application rejection.
- Copied and plagiarized content
Writing copied and plagiarized content is strictly forbidden by the authority. Your RPL ACS skill evaluation report must be fresh and original. Although you can take references from RPL samples provided online, don’t copy them. Remember you will not only face rejection but you will also be banned by the IBP department.
You must know the difference between format and content. You can use a similar format (the structure of the report), but you can’t use the written content. If you are unable to do so, then hire an RPL ACS skill assessment report writing specialist. They will write your report with fresh content and strictly follow the guidelines, which will leave no room for rejection.
- Not proofreading or editing
Many candidates, especially those in haste, don’t read their reports properly and don’t do proofreading and editing. Such aspirants are more prone to rejection. It’s wise to check, proofread, edit and enhance your report as much as needed. Sometimes, people don’t consider plagiarism checking an important task.
You should know that ACS uses powerful tools like TURNITIN for plagiarism and duplicates. Sometimes, plagiarism happens unknowingly. There check for plagiarism, grammar mistakes, sentence structure, ambiguous language and the like before you go for the submission.
- Irrelevant descriptions
In an effort to impress the authority, sometimes applicants write more than required. It leads to irrelevancy to the chosen job. If your selected occupation from the ANZSCO list doesn’t harmonize with the descriptions you provide, then your application is sure to face rejection.
The assessment authority is interested to know your capability in the chosen field or job, and giving them an irrelevant job description is not expected from the candidate.
So, check every point you made for its relevance and connection with the ICT job you are applying for.
If you need expert guidance and consultation concerning the RPL ACS skill assessment report, then feel free to reach us.